Advertising for medical and aesthetic treatments is constrained in ways ordinary retail is not. Before-and-after imagery is subject to rules about representativeness and disclosure; testimonials describing outcomes carry requirements; and claims about results, safety or superiority need to be supportable rather than aspirational.
We are not your regulatory advisor and will not tell you what your board permits. What we will do is flag where a draft is making a claim rather than a description, keep outcome language conditional, and decline the tactics — undisclosed retouching, invented testimonials, superlatives about results — that create exposure disproportionate to any traffic they win.
Patient privacy is the other constant: consent for imagery needs to be real, specific and documented, and it is worth more than the photograph.